Bielik v3 11B Instruct

GPAI Provider: SpeakLeash

Metadata

Model URL: https://huggingface.co/speakleash/Bielik-11B-v3.0-Instruct
When was this model published? 2025-12-31
Is this a new or a fine-tuned model? Fine-tuned model
When was the Public Summary last updated? 2026-01-01
When did we evaluate the Public Summary? 2026-01-12
Where did we find the Public Summary? We found this document linked on this page. An archived version can be found here.

Results of Evaluation

Section Transparency Usefulness General
Clarity Completeness Consistency Correctness Accessibility Comprehension Transparency Usefulness
Document 81.82 100.0 100.0 80.0 100.0 66.67 88.89 84.21
General information 78.89 86.59 100.0 100.0 100.0 90.91 87.03 93.75
Public Data Sources 100.0 74.29 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 86.91 100.0
Private Data Sources N/A 100.0 100.0 100.0 N/A N/A 100.0 N/A
Scraped/Crawled Data 91.6 81.48 100.0 77.88 0.0 67.95 83.78 51.46
User Data N/A 100.0 100.0 100.0 N/A N/A 100.0 N/A
Synthetic/Other Data 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 N/A 100.0 100.0 100.0
Data Processing 94.74 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 86.96 98.72 71.43
Sum 92.74 82.48 100.0 88.65 46.67 80.51 88.02 71.11
Grades B+C+

Evaluation Notes

If you update your public summary, please let us know so that we can update the evaluation and scores. We also welcome suggestions on improvements to this page, e.g. see FAQ section.

The open collaboration project SpeakLeash publishes a public summary for its Bielik v3 11B Instruct model on its website and also links it in its model card. The public summary follows the structure of the template, and describes Bielik as a fine-tuned version of Mistral. Of note, Bielik utilised the optional additional comments field in Section 1.3 to describe the purposes, regional, and linguistic characteristics of the dataset used as based on Polish and EU legal administrative domains and the inclusion of Silesian and Kashubian language Wikipedia pages. For their list of public data sources, however, the description referenced external documents ('preprints') which resulted in a deduction of points as relevant information was not provided in the document. We assessed its score to be 88.02% with grade B+ for transparency, and 71.11% with grade C+ for usefulness.

Suggested Improvements
The following are the suggested improvements based on using our our methodology where the public summary had issues related to the specified metric. The severity represents the extent of the issue, with low indicating aspects that could be fixable, and high representing missing information or requiring major changes.

  • Document
    • M1 The document and the information should be simple and clear low
    • M4 The information must be correct and accurate low
    • M6 The document and information must be comprehensible for stakeholders medium
  • General information
    • M1 The document and the information should be simple and clear low
    • M2 The document and information must be filled in completely low
    • M6 The document and information must be comprehensible for stakeholders low
  • Public Data Sources
    • M2 The document and information must be filled in completely medium
  • Scraped/Crawled Data
    • M1 The document and the information should be simple and clear low
    • M2 The document and information must be filled in completely low
    • M4 The information must be correct and accurate low
    • M5 The document and information must be accessible for stakeholders high
    • M6 The document and information must be comprehensible for stakeholders medium
  • Data Processing
    • M1 The document and the information should be simple and clear low
    • M5 The document and information must be accessible for stakeholders high
    • M6 The document and information must be comprehensible for stakeholders low
  • Sum
    • M1 The document and the information should be simple and clear low
    • M2 The document and information must be filled in completely low
    • M4 The information must be correct and accurate low
    • M5 The document and information must be accessible for stakeholders high
    • M6 The document and information must be comprehensible for stakeholders low