Bria 3.2

GPAI Provider: Bria AI

Metadata

Model URL: https://huggingface.co/briaai/BRIA-3.2
When was this model published? 2025-06-10
Is this a new or a fine-tuned model? New model
When was the Public Summary last updated? 2026-01-06
When did we evaluate the Public Summary? 2026-01-12
Where did we find the Public Summary? We found this document linked on this page. An archived version can be found here.

Results of Evaluation

Section Transparency Usefulness General
Clarity Completeness Consistency Correctness Accessibility Comprehension Transparency Usefulness
Document 81.82 25.0 100.0 40.0 70.0 66.67 70.37 68.42
General information 81.25 60.26 100.0 71.43 N/A 92.86 69.73 92.86
Public Data Sources N/A 100.0 100.0 100.0 N/A N/A 100.0 N/A
Private Data Sources 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 N/A 100.0 100.0 100.0
Scraped/Crawled Data N/A 100.0 100.0 100.0 N/A N/A 100.0 N/A
User Data N/A 100.0 100.0 100.0 N/A N/A 100.0 N/A
Synthetic/Other Data N/A 100.0 100.0 100.0 N/A N/A 100.0 N/A
Data Processing 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Sum 90.59 79.76 100.0 90.82 88.0 96.3 86.97 94.74
Grades B+A

Evaluation Notes

If you update your public summary, please let us know so that we can update the evaluation and scores. We also welcome suggestions on improvements to this page, e.g. see FAQ section.

The public summary for the Bria 3.2 model is published by Bria AI on its website under the 'Security & Compliance' section, as a link to a PDF hosted on Google Drive. The summary closely follows the structure of the template, but provided contact details for the authorised representative and not for the company itself. The document also lacked some metadata such as version information and links to documentation. The summary describes training only involving licensed data, which requires relatively little disclosure through the template. We assessed its score as 86.97% with a grade of B+ for transparency, and 94.74% with a grade of A for usefulness.

Suggested Improvements
The following are the suggested improvements based on using our our methodology where the public summary had issues related to the specified metric. The severity represents the extent of the issue, with low indicating aspects that could be fixable, and high representing missing information or requiring major changes.

  • Document
    • M1 The document and the information should be simple and clear low
    • M2 The document and information must be filled in completely high
    • M4 The information must be correct and accurate high
    • M5 The document and information must be accessible for stakeholders medium
    • M6 The document and information must be comprehensible for stakeholders medium
  • General information
    • M1 The document and the information should be simple and clear low
    • M2 The document and information must be filled in completely medium
    • M4 The information must be correct and accurate medium
    • M6 The document and information must be comprehensible for stakeholders low
  • Sum
    • M1 The document and the information should be simple and clear low
    • M2 The document and information must be filled in completely low
    • M4 The information must be correct and accurate low
    • M5 The document and information must be accessible for stakeholders low
    • M6 The document and information must be comprehensible for stakeholders low